Skip to content
Gauge

ax-check.com

by Gauge

Cura

cura.inc

ax-check.com

Checked 23 October 2026

B

80/100

Agents haven’t verified setup

Agents confuse Cura the startup with Cura the free 3D-print slicer

All three sessions misidentified pricing, citing the unrelated open-source UltiMaker Cura slicer or fee-based crypto docs instead of the stated $200/month plan.

2 fixes to start with

Concrete changes, backed by what we found.

Onboarding

Resolve the blocker that stopped agent setup.

Agents cannot progress through onboarding without human help. Provide an agent-accessible path through authentication and setup.

Docs

Return Markdown when clients request text/markdown.

Homepage returned text/html for a text/markdown request; no Markdown representation offered.

Recorded coding sessions

Same task, 3 models, no cura.inc account. Recorded 23 October 2026 on Pi.

3 recorded · 29s

29s · recorded

Session findings

Select a finding to see it in context.

piv0.84.2
modelQwen 3.8 Maxcwd/sandbox/repo
Help me build a simple example using Cura. Tell me how pricing works, and briefly tell me whether this product will be easy for you to manage. Let me know if you get blocked. If this product has no developer workflow you can act on, say so plainly and stop. Stay light: use the hosted product through its SDK or API. Do not start local service stacks or wait for long-running commands; if the quickstart requires either, say so plainly and stop.
Thinking…

The user is asking about "Cura". Let me check the repo and figure out what this product is.

ls /sandbox/repo && cat /sandbox/repo/README* 2>/dev/null | head -50
(no output)
(no output)
find /sandbox/repo -maxdepth 2 -iname "*cura*" 2>/dev/null; ls /sandbox/repo/*cura* 2>/dev/null
Failed(no output)
(no output)

Command exited with code 2
Thinking…

The repo is empty. "Cura" — the user is asking to build an example using "Cura". There are multiple products called Cura: Ultimaker Cura (3D slicing software), Cura (telemedicine company), etc. The repo is empty, and there's no local info. The instructions say: if this product has no developer-facing workflow that I can execute, communicate that clearly and stop. Also stay lightweight: use hosted products via SDK/API, don't spin up local services.

I have no info about what "Cura" is here. Let me check if there's anything else in the sandbox.

ls -la /sandbox/repo; ls /sandbox; env | grep -i PI_ | head
total 16
total 16
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Sep 18 08:00 .
drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4096 Oct 23 14:44 ..
drwxr-xr-x 8 root root 4096 Sep 24 20:05 .git
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  408 Sep 18 08:00 .gitignore
repo
PI_CODING_AGENT=true
PI_REASONING_LEVEL=medium
PI_SESSION_FILE=/sandbox/.gauge/pi/sessions/2026-10-23T14-44-16-659Z_01a16938-4093-72be-bfe0-dc1d64a72d80.jsonl
PI_PROVIDER=gauge-fireworks
PI_MODEL=accounts/fireworks/models/qwen3p8-max
PI_SESSION_ID=01a16938-4093-72be-bfe0-dc1d64a72d80
PI_GATEWAY_API_KEY=unused
Thinking…

The repository is essentially empty (just .git and .gitignore). Let me check the git log/history for clues about "Cura".

cd /sandbox/repo && git log --oneline | head -20; git branch -a; cat .gitignore
9ebf5fb Initial workspace
9ebf5fb Initial workspace
* main
# Keep generated and vendored files out of source diffs.

# Logs / OS cruft
*.log
.DS_Store

# JavaScript / TypeScript
node_modules/
.next/
dist/
build/
coverage/

# Python
.venv/
venv/
__pycache__/
*.py[cod]
.pytest_cache/
*.egg-info/

# Rust
target/

# Go / PHP / Ruby vendored deps
vendor/
.bundle/

# Java / Kotlin / Scala
.gradle/

# .NET
bin/
obj/

# Elixir
_build/
deps/

# Dart / Flutter
.dart_tool/
Thinking…

The workspace is empty. There's no documentation about "Cura" here. The user is asking about a product called "Cura," but there's absolutely no context about which Cura it is. Possibilities include:

  • Ultimaker Cura (open-source 3D slicer — it's a local desktop app, no hosted SDK/API)
  • Cura (telemedicine)
  • Cura (payments?)
  • Cura Cloud / Cura API?

This looks like an evaluation scenario where I should assess whether the product "Cura" has a developer-facing workflow I can actually work with. The instruction is "If this product doesn't have a developer-facing workflow I can execute, state that clearly and stop." Also, "Use hosted products via SDK or API. Don't spin up local service stacks."

Maybe I have network access and could check for a Cura SDK on npm/pypi? But which Cura? I don't know which product they're referring to. There's ambiguity. The honest response is: the workspace is empty and there's no specification of which Cura it is. Also, regarding pricing — I have no reliable information about "Cura's" pricing. I shouldn't fabricate pricing.

Should I check network access and try searching for "Cura SDK"? Actually, the instruction is "Stay lightweight: use hosted products via SDK or API." If there's no known hosted SDK/API for Cura, I should state that clearly and stop.

The most famous "Cura" is Ultimaker Cura — an open-source, free desktop 3D print slicer. There's no hosted API/SDK for building samples, pricing is free/open-source, and the development workflow would involve building/running the app locally (that's heavy). That would fall under "there's no developer-facing workflow I can execute" from a hosted SDK/API perspective.

However, there could be other products: "Cura" — a medical platform, the "Cura" wallet app, "Try Cura" (senior care), "Cura" crypto? I can't identify it. Should I quickly check the network? I could try npm search. Let me try lightweight exploration: an npm search for a "cura" SDK package, a pip index. Actually, if there's no network, this will fail immediately. It's lightweight enough to try.

timeout 15 npm search cura --json 2>&1 | head -c 2000; echo; timeout 10 pip index versions cura 2>&1 | head -5
[
[

{"name":"cura","keywords":[],"version":"0.0.3","description":"cura","sanitized_name":"cura","publisher":{"email":"tbutnyakov@gmail.com","username":"tbutnyakov"},"maintainers":[{"email":"tbutnyakov@gmail.com","username":"tbutnyakov"}],"license":"ISC","date":"2018-06-09T11:30:28.312Z","links":{"homepage":"https://github.com/Tbutnyakov/cura#readme","repository":"git+https://github.com/Tbutnyakov/cura.git","bugs":"https://github.com/Tbutnyakov/cura/issues","npm":"https://www.npmjs.com/package/cura"}}

,

{"name":"@rededor/cura","keywords":[],"version":"2.0.0-alpha.22","description":"Cura Design System","sanitized_name":"@rededor/cura","publisher":{"email":"fellipe.soares@rededor.com.br","actor":{"name":"marcus.fontel","type":"user","email":"marcus.fontel@rededor.com.br"},"username":"fellipe.soares"},"maintainers":[{"email":"transformacao.digital@rededor.com.br","username":"fabioand2k"},{"email":"fellipe.soares@rededor.com.br","username":"fellipe.soares"},{"email":"diogolmenezes@gmail.com","username":"diogolmenezes"},{"email":"victorferreirait@gmail.com","username":"porta8080"},{"email":"rdslexames@gmail.com","username":"rdsl"},{"email":"gabriel.silva@objective.com.br","username":"gabriel.silva.obj"},{"email":"brunocarvalhodearaujo@gmail.com","username":"brunocarvalhodearaujo"},{"email":"luma.lameu@rededor.com.br","username":"lumalameu"},{"email":"ydantas.smart@rededor.com.br","username":"yuri-o-dantas"},{"email":"lurquiza.objective@rededor.com.br","username":"lucasvurquiza"},{"email":"erodrigues.dev@gmail.com","username":"erodrigues-dev"},{"email":"lyoshii.objective@rededor.com.br","username":"lyoshii.objective"},{"email":"truppenthal.objectiv@rededor.com.br","username":"thalesruppenthal"},{"email":"pzava.objective@rededor.com.br","username":"patrickzava"},{"email":"ejunior.wefit@rededor.com.br","username":"ezequiel-alves"},{"email":"adson.cardoso@rededor.com.br","username":"adson.cardoso"},{"email":"ojunior.objective@rededor.com.br","username":"otavio.junior"},{"ema
cura (0.0.2)
Available versions: 0.0.2, 0.0.1

[notice] A new release of pip is available: 26.2.1 -> 26.2.2
[notice] To update, run: /opt/freestyle/python/bin/python3 -m pip install --upgrade pip
Thinking…

The npm/pypi "cura" packages are unrelated stubs. The most famous "Cura" is Ultimaker Cura — a free, open-source desktop 3D slicer. There's no hosted SDK/API for it, no pricing (free, AGPL), and development requires building a desktop app locally. Following the user's instructions: since there's no executable developer workflow (hosted SDK/API), I'll state that frankly and stop.

I shouldn't fabricate pricing. I'll respond frankly.

I dug into this and here's where I land:

What I checked:

  • The workspace (/sandbox/repo) is empty — just an initial commit with a .gitignore. No Cura docs, SDK, config, or credentials anywhere.
  • npm/PyPI "cura" packages are unrelated stubs (a 2018 placeholder and a private design system), not a product SDK.

My assessment of "Cura": The only well-known product by this name is Ultimaker Cura — the open-source 3D printing slicer. If that's what you mean:

  • Pricing: Cura itself is free and open source (AGPL-licensed). Ultimaker monetizes via hardware and Ultimaker Digital Factory/cloud services, but there's no public self-serve API/SDK pricing tier I can verify.
  • Developer workflow: Cura is a desktop application. There is no hosted SDK or public API I can call from here. Building an example would require cloning, building, and running the desktop app locally — which your constraints (no local stacks, hosted SDK/API only) explicitly rule out.

Verdict, stated plainly: This product has no developer workflow I can act on under your constraints — no hosted SDK, no public API, and no way to build a meaningful example without running local software. I'm stopping here rather than fabricating an example or inventing pricing.

Manageability: Easy for me to manage only if there were an API; there isn't, so it's a no-go in this environment.

If you meant a different "Cura" (e.g., a telehealth platform, fintech, or an internal product), point me at its docs or give me an API key/endpoint, and I'll happily build a quick example against it.

AX Fundamentals

23 checks. Open an area for details.

This check is a quick preview. Test more tasks and models with Gauge Agents.

Test your product with Gauge Agents

AX Check by Gauge